Following the massive launch of the 7970’s, it has now come time to test out their sister chip, the 7950. On hand we have the XFX Double Dissipation and the XFX Double Dissipation Black Edition Overclocked edition. Let’s take a look at the cards major specs and differences.
Double Dissipation
|
Double Dissipation Black Edition Overclocked
| |
GPU Clock
|
800MHz
|
900MHz
|
Memory Bus
|
384-bit
|
384-bit
|
Memory Clock
|
5.0GHz
|
5.5GHz
|
Power Requirement
|
500 watt (2x 6-pin)
|
500 watt (2x 6-pin)
|
For testing we have gathered and built our system with the following parts and components:
Intel Core i7 2700k (Stock Speeds)
G.Skill DDR3 8GB (2x 4GB) 1600MHz
Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3R
Corsair HX1050 PSU
Noctua NH-U9B-SE2 CPU Cooler
OCZ Agility 3 Series 120GB SSD
Cooler Master HAF-X
G.Skill DDR3 8GB (2x 4GB) 1600MHz
Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3R
Corsair HX1050 PSU
Noctua NH-U9B-SE2 CPU Cooler
OCZ Agility 3 Series 120GB SSD
Cooler Master HAF-X
Features
Unpacking the cards is like deja-vu from the 7970’s. Identical packaging’s all around will the same packaging layout across all the models. Good design consistency throughout.
Let’s take a look at the few features displayed across its packaging.
XFX claim its cards to feature Hydrocell Thermal Solution. This is a vapour chamber based on the same principles as heat-pipe technology, which uses a recirculation process and wick system for vaporization.
Duratec Professional Grade technology with basic ally represents XFX’s standard for their components and build quality, which also include XFX’s own bracket design featuring the XFX logo.
Ghost Thermal Technology allows the airflow from the fans to blow directly through the heat sink onto the PCB board itself. This allows for greater airflow on and around the card, helping keep the fans at lower speeds.
Design
Both these fans are the Double Dissipation models which feature a custom heat sink which runs the length of the board topped off with 2 fans. They look and feel slick with the shiny aluminium encasing the heat sinks.
The cards are quite long and roughly the same dimensions as the flagship 7970’s so make sure you have adequate space in your case before eyeing out of these.
Performance
Now with our 7970 review, we did the review quite earlier than the release date, so we were stuck with the Driver software packaged with the released version. This turned out to be a slight downfall for us where in our performance tests, the cards just did not do as well as we expected and as well as it should have. So with the 7950’s we skipped over the installation CD and went straight to AMD to grab the latest available drivers for the cards, and we must say, what a massive difference!
For testing purposes we ran benchmarks including a spec-heavy selection of games, 3dMark11 and Heaven.
For our selection of games we had:
Arma II
Crysis 2
Skyrim
Metro 2033
All our games were played at 1920x1080 with max settings on everything. For consistency purposes we played the same levels on all cards for equal length of time. Our results consisted of minimum and the average FPS of the games. At the same time we were recording the temperature of the card and system in general.
The cards performed very well and the clock differences showed in its results.
Our Heaven benchmarking software was set at Full HD resolution with maxed setting and extreme tessellation. After all, these cards are marketed as having very good capabilities with high tessellation models. The cards performed as below:
XFX Double D
FPS: 41.7
Scores: 1050
Min FPS: 10.3
Max FPS: 101.2
XFX Double D Clocked
FPS: 41.9
Scores: 1055
Min FPS: 18.6
Max FPS: 102.1
FPS: 41.7
Scores: 1050
Min FPS: 10.3
Max FPS: 101.2
XFX Double D Clocked
FPS: 41.9
Scores: 1055
Min FPS: 18.6
Max FPS: 102.1
Looking at the results at first glance doesn’t show a massive difference; however the Min FPS has a difference of over 8 FPS.
Next we had 3DMark 11. Running at the extreme setting our cards performed following.
XFX Double D: X2261
XFX Double D Clocked: X2279
XFX Double D Clocked: X2279
As expected the slightly higher clocked card came out on top.
Temperatures on the cards were actually impressive, idling at the 41 mark with peak of any of the two cards at 65. Having the same heat sink on both cards provided us with almost identical results. Not only were temperatures impressive but was relatively quiet, especially compared to the stock reference editions of the cards. All that mumbo jumbo XFX put on the card in relation to its thermal solutions seem not to be a gimmick but actual technology that does make a difference to the cards performance.
To finish up, these cards are fantastic. I’ve reviewed a fair few products at Centre Com and not a lot of products I’ve tested I’ve actually liked, sure I’ve enjoyed a lot of them and they have performed well, but there was something about these 7950’s that I haven’t found in other products yet. For its price tag you get yourself a magnificent card with solid performing results.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.